Resolution:Standard | High | Highest
TPMtv:Fact Check:Romney vs. Obama
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Homepage > Categories > People & Lifestyle

TPMtv:Fact Check:Romney vs. Obama

 
 
 

Video Details

Uploaded Aug. 16, 2007 by
VeracifierVeracifier

Fact Check: Romney vs. Obama Mitt Romney recently attacked Barack Obama over his comments regarding the war in Afghanistan and the need for more troops on the ground, so as to reduce the reliance on air raids that have often resulted in Afghan civil

Post your comment

  • user avatar

Showing 1 - 5 of 8 comments

Show hidden comments
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
    Abunai

    Abunai's comment and (2) replies are hidden

    Abunai

    Abunai - 3 years ago

    Am I missing something here???: This is completely a NON-Story. Why we arguing about who said what?? Romney and Obama are BOTH for the War! Romney was just being a politician, and trying to twist obama's words because they are opponents! That's what they do! But they are BOTH pro-War!

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
    • Abunai

      Abunai - 3 years ago

      @AbunaiAlso,: let me get this straigh: Obama says there are too many incidents where we mistakenly kill afghan civilians, so his solution is SEND MORE TROOPS????????!! How does that make sense???? Obama supporters need to get a clue.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • Abunai

      Abunai - 3 years ago

      @AbunaiGo: RON PAUL! The ONLY Anti-War, Anti-Tax, Anti-IRS, Anti-Government, Pro-Liberty, Pro-Freedom, Pro-Constitution Candidate!

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
  • omgwtfpwnxxorbbq

    omgwtfpwnxxorbbq - 2 years ago

    There is my favorite interviewer at work at 06:05!: Ahhhh, uhhhhh, ahhhh, uhhhhhh, in ahhhhh, afghanistan....uhhhhh. lol. What an ass clown.

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
    hafmoa

    hafmoa's comment and (1) replies are hidden

    hafmoa

    hafmoa - 2 years ago

    Josh Marshal's name calling destroys his creditability.: Mitt Romney never said civilians weren't being killed. He took exception to the way Obama used it to make our troops look bad. Civilians get killed in all wars and most all leaders take exception to that. Obama did not choose his words carefully. If he is going to be handling these kind of situation. He is going to have to learn to be diplomatic. You can do a lot of damage with one slip of the tongue.

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
    • omgwtfpwnxxorbbq

      omgwtfpwnxxorbbq - 2 years ago

      @hafmoaBeing polite and using doublespeak: is how we got into this colossal quagmire. Simple logic test...are civilians getting killed by US troops? Yes. Is the Afghanistan government pissed about it? Yes. The end. I rather Obama not sugar coat it. Tell us like it is...

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
  • solusdeus

    solusdeus - 2 years ago

    libs make me sick: obama has a 0.5% chance of becoming president, so what is your point?

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • morgoniustwonk

    morgoniustwonk - 2 years ago

    be more objective, for more creditability: Josh Marshal, your obvious bias towards Obama is clearly evident. Try to be more objective, and you will have more creditability. While I like Obama, to say that he is a more experienced "leader" because Romney mistook what he said, is a bit of a logical fallacy. A "leader" should be judged on their experience, track record, moral fiber/character, and their political views. I think both Romney & Obama have promise, a lot more so then Geoge W. Bush has.

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00

VoteBar 1.1