Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics pt.3

Posted by LooseChangeLies on Apr. 11, 2007

Be funny. Don't be mean. We may remove comments that cross the line.

Showing 1 - 0 of 0 comments

Sort by: Show hidden comments

Wow2113 - 2 years ago

you know... I was honestly watching these videos hoping that these popular mechanics guys would have at least SOME answers to debunk the "Loose Change" videos. But they pretty much just bumbled around the whole time... They didn't answer anything

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
Kincaid333 - 2 years ago

Hmmm.....: Popular Mechanics guys are bumbling idiots.... They never actually answer the question they are asked? True political reporters I guess.

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
HotKarl27 - 2 years ago

The fact that these two Loose Change guys are still alive: is proof that the government was not behind the attacks. If their assessment is correct, and the government has no qualms about killing nearly 3000 people, two more should be no problem for them.

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
canadasuxs - 2 years ago

If it was not the plane that did it: then where are the people that were on the plane? Did the gov kill them all or are all of them still alive and keeping this secret. Idiots.

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
Fu_Cktard - 2 years ago

People, let's go back a couple steps...: Why would the gov't, in a secret plot to destroy our own shit (for some undisclosed reason), decide to shoot a missile at the pentagon, then SAY it was a hijacked plane? Why not just ACTUALLY crash a plane into it? Would that not be a lot easier/safer to fake?

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
thomas_c_63 - 2 years ago

WINDOWS: they must have changed the windows right away. NOT. Full of shit. they cant even answer anything

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
PINTO20 - 2 years ago

hmmm?: why whould the landing gear be down to make a whole if they were going to crash it anyway explain that PM!

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
- jamblay - 2 years ago
  
  @PINTO20 Dipshit: The landing gear exists regardless. It doesn't have to be down. The plane disintegrated. The landing gear did not. There's your explanation. I reitereate... dipshit
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
- negativekelvin - 2 years ago
  
  @PINTO20 jamblay: yeah, the landing gear made an almost symetrical circle in steel reinforced concrete. Titanium engines disintegrated before even hitting the building but the landing gear busted thru several walls. dipshit
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
- Fu_Cktard - 2 years ago
  
  @PINTO20 i don't think: anyone said that the engines "disintegrated before hitting the steel reinforced concrete"
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
ffrusmc - 2 years ago

proof: there is a video on the internet of a f4 phantom used in a test of crashing it into a section of reinorced concrete used on nuclear reactors which i think is somewhat similar of what might have been used on the pentagon well when the fighter plane hits the section of reinforced concrete the plane becomes completely vaporized and the only thing left is the section of the wings that didnt not hit the section of concrete which proves that possible the 757 could have been completely destroyed. I work a

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
- ChaunceyGrizzly - 2 years ago
  
  @ffrusmc What, no takers: He gave you something to debunk. Common use your "facts."
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
Doremo - 2 years ago

ignorance: Anyone who can actually believe these kids are just plain ignorant. While the guys from PM are spewing facts and such, the Loose change kids are just questioning their facts without bringing up any of theirs. Not to mention that of course the government isn't about to hand out information about terrorist facts to students making a "documentary". That's a pretty suspicious alibi to be asking the government for information about. Did they even think that the wings and engines would probably fold b

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
- uppercutter - 2 years ago
  
  @Doremo fold back?: well then where is it? any plane crash ive seen always has identifiable wreckege of a plane. but you go ahead and believe what the government tells you, they have no agenda other then protecting us from bin ladin...
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
- vhx - 2 years ago
  
  @Doremo Lol ignorance?: Facts? The guys from PM claim to have all these photographs yet not one person has seen it. Show me a picture of the landing gear, or wings please. The kids have eyewitness reports STRAIGHT from people involved on the scene. Not reports written by government officials. Not sure what facts you are referring to. I didn't think a question like WHERE IS THE PLANE would jeopardize national security. Meh I would rather have the government release the 50 videos that they confiscated of the pentag
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
- Mabans - 2 years ago
  
  @Doremo @VHX: I've never seen a million dollars or a red blood cell doesn't mean it doesn't exsist? I can debunk you by saying you are nothing more than nothing more than a LC Loyalist with a gripe against the government. You could say I'm wrong, with proof but all that it would take is me questioning your motives. I'm all for questioning the goevrnement but what these guys are just saying the proverbal "yeah right!" that's all..
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
- brunobajsluva - 2 years ago
  
  @Doremo Zeitgeist bitch: watch it.
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
- negativekelvin - 2 years ago
  
  @Doremo Doremo: I havent heard one hard "fact" from the PM guys in this entire video. They claim theyve seen photos etc. Why them and not other organizations that ask questions?
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
- negativekelvin - 2 years ago
  
  @Doremo continued: Seems to me like the government is picking and choosing who the trust with the "evidence". How are terrorists going to use (clear)footage of a plane hitting the pentagon to theyre advantage? Your points are weak and easily disputed.
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
prendec - 2 years ago

These old guys are morons!: argh

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
- neowestlondon - 2 years ago
  
  @prendec yo: i totally agree with you man. they are so like nervous compared to the loose change young men
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
Conspiracy_Theorist - 2 years ago

Why?: Throughout the entire debate the guys from PM keep saying, "Are evidence comes from photographs." They say they have a picture of the landing gear in the so-called 90 foot hole, they say they have a picture of the airplane in the Pentagon... Why has no one but those two 'journalists' seen those pictures. I can't say that I believe everything these kids are saying, and expressing such alligations that a missile hit the building is very unorthadox, but the questions they are asking are very good questi

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
Stu_Padaso - 2 years ago

Shame on PM for making dylan & gappy cry!: they worked long & hard to come up with their conspiricy allegations, even if they didn't bother checking facts or reviewing evidence..

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
Cjorge_ - 2 years ago

I: I believe that loose change is completely correct.. :) GG AMERICA.

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
joemaniac - 2 years ago

not too bright: Codyis1337lawl said:4/12/2007 1:28:05 AM mythbusters : is the shittiest show on earth. they arent even scientist theyre just assholes with network funding to debunk shit that arent even myths. well what the hell do you think a scientists is genius, its just someone with a doctorate that tests stuff and analyzes the results, so even if youre an electrical engineer(which most of them are) and you do that kind of stuff youre called a scientists. people that make CPU's are called scientist

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
evox786 - 2 years ago

those fuckers: Think they're so high and mighty because they mad a film that people watch. Maybe if they pulled their heads out of their asses they could actually have a mature debate. If they expect people to take them seriously, they have to take others seriously. I hope terrorists get a hold of them and behead them with a dull rusty blade.

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
- Conspiracy_Theorist - 2 years ago
  
  @evox786 that's very: mature
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
- dlreed916 - 2 years ago
  
  @evox786 i agree: with evox786...they are being pretty immature about it. whenever a fact is presented that goes against their own theories, they laugh and shake their heads like only what they are saying can possibly be true and if you refute what they think, you are obviously wrong. "If they expect people to take them seriously, they have to take others seriously." is exactly right...they want people to hear what they have to say, but dont want to listen and cant even keep a straight face when evidence is present
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
nickc31 - 2 years ago

Wait, what?: So the US Gov't has: 1) the organizational skills to pull off a precise and large-scale surprise attack on American soil 2) it has the power and money to cover up the "conspiracy" 3) it has no moral qualms about killing thousands of innocent Americans BUT at the same time the US Gov't does NOT have the power, organizational skill or gumption to stop two dudes from making a movie exposing "the truth"????

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
- Khain - 2 years ago
  
  @nickc31 Someone: reads maddox
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
- prcush - 2 years ago
  
  @nickc31 haha: what ? how would the governement be able to stop these guys from making this vid...theyre using public info and evidence....thats basically their point...they wouldnt be doing this if the governement would just release some clear video and photos that evidently they have
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
- ShamanWS6 - 2 years ago
  
  @nickc31 once the vid is out there...: ...once it's out there, it's out there. Especially in this world of the Internet. Can't turn back time.
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
Babo636 - 2 years ago

it would've been: a better debate if it was them and some engineers instead of some journalists claiming he said she said

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
- prcush - 2 years ago
  
  @Babo636 ...: engineers would have no argument....they would agree with the loose change guys....everything to do with the buildings stucture etc. the loose change dudes are right...these journailists are dumb shits.."jet fuel poured down the elevator shaft blah blah" ok there
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
kasalisk - 2 years ago

they;re immature: they make good points and are smart but they snicker and stuff and thats seriously annoying... But I'll hand it too them, they're good debators.

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
gocolts - 2 years ago

I thought all this was bullshit: But these loose change kids are killing these dudes from PM.

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
n00bmaker1337 - 2 years ago

Retards: Watch episode 1009 (Mystery of the Urinal Deuce) of South Park, it says it all, no doubt.

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
onesolution - 2 years ago

Loose Change 1, Popular Mechanics 0: Wake up America. Dont get me wrong I am for my country but please listen to the facts. DevilDog 0341/6212

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
- SpiritInAgrave - 2 years ago
  
  @onesolution The worst part is: BECAUSE the loose change faggots are shitty debators, dumb faggots like you believe what they say. Did you ever wonder why the original 'documentary' felated only one side of the arguement?
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
GoTeamHiroshima - 2 years ago

All conspiracies aside...: the "Loose Change" kids have NO clue how to debate like civilized human beings. Snickering, shaking their heads, interrupting, loading their questions like crazy...

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
- ShoTym - 2 years ago
  
  @GoTeamHiroshima Actually they're very very good.....: It's the other guys that have yet to provide one photo. They have yet to provide anything but "talk". "we didn't cross check every fact.." are you serious??? We looked at the broad scope. Please. LC won this debate
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
- KyEdGa - 2 years ago
  
  @GoTeamHiroshima shotym: tbh who are you going to believe some kids making money off these theories that no one backs or the older group who actual have a reasonable tone and probably have engineers and more specialists .... by the way they photoed the opposite side of the building and said "where were the wings"..... it has been prooved
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
murcury - 2 years ago

omg: If it was a cruise missile then it would've exploded after it went through the building. If it punched through all those walls it would've exploded at the end. Not to mention a cruise missile would've absolutely demolished that side of pentagon, that's what they're made for.

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
- onesolution - 2 years ago
  
  @murcury omg: You must not have a miltary background. Please delete your comment. DevilDog0341/6212
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0
www5555 - 2 years ago

I think that the Loose change kids have a good point.: I really think if they where adults you guys would beleive in this LC story. Because i do, and i have for over a year. Just this clip Popular Mechanics lied, the ring was not 90 feet. That was even released by the goverment. Overall both sides have a few bugs in their story, but i beleive popular mechanics have much more

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
3rdRangersFox - 2 years ago

LISTEN: You little pieces of shit aught to listen to these "LC douches" because they actually have a point...but if you want to just blindly believe these Popular Mechanic ROBOTS, then go ahead. Contribute to this nations mass stupidity.

Reply Flag as spam
0 0
- mrdude1986 - 2 years ago
  
  @3rdRangersFox oh: shut up and get an education.
  
  Reply Flag as spam
  0 0

Show more comments Back to top

Upload Your Videos

Earn cash by uploading your videos

Check the widget spec for intended functionality. However, no support is intended for upload direct in the page at this time.

Sign In (or register) on Break.com

Upload
your videos

UPLOAD

Break

Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics pt.3

Say Something

No one's made a comment yet. Share your thoughts.

Showing 1 - 0 of 0 comments

Upload Your Videos

Sign In (or register) on Break.com

Upload
your videos

Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics pt.3

No one's made a comment yet. Share your thoughts.

Showing 1 - 0 of 0 comments

Sign In (or register) on Break.com

Upload your videos

Upload
your videos