tuned smart car vs ferrari
tommyab - 3 years ago
In case you didn't know...: The smart car is powered by a 1300cc Suzuki Hayabusa engine. Not batteries or the stock engine.
hostiekid - 2 years ago
Know what you are talking about;: The damn smart car ic equipped with a 1,000cc motor that is turbocharged on top of that!It does'nt have anything to do with battery power or technology.It's just Dr. Frankenstein of the new age.
Kashakesh - 2 years ago
Did someone let my retarded cousing drive that ferrari?: Not sure if this is an f430 or not, but they go 0-60 in 3.7 seconds with a competent driver who isn't busy getting high. Even then, the 483 bhp should take care of the job. Unless they hit the brakes when they mean to clutch...
satyriasis - 2 years ago
Oh please: Power-to-weight ratio definitely favored the Smart Car. Gimmeabreak. Not even a fair race.
Dietrich's comment and (6) replies are hidden
Dietrich - 2 years ago
Ummm Yeah: Tune Out that Ferrari and See what She can Do!!!! Fuck the smart car
IndyDevil - 2 years ago
@DietrichTry: to see which will get a woman to get in first.
Mike595 - 2 years ago
@DietrichRepost: Saw this awhile back..smart car has a bikes engine in it from either an r1 or a bussa...i forget. But its nowhere near stock
spitvenom - 2 years ago
@Dietrichfuck a ferrai: I can pull a bitch from a cab!
OJSimpson - 2 years ago
@DietrichLOL Indy: That is a very very valid point IndyDevil!!LOL!! "Hey, baby you wanna get in my suped up golf cart"
@DietrichGood point: Any women would get in the Ferrari and laugh at the little couch on wheels...
Ski_Bird - 2 years ago
@DietrichTake it from an EE: Mark my words. In 20 years, you'll look back at this race and wonder why the Ferrari even tried. The power stored in batteries, as long as your motor can handle it is near instant. The torque you can generate is EXACTLY why diesel locomotives use BATTERIES to pull some serious weight...
