Posted by deftrhiney on Dec. 06, 2006
Be funny. Don't be mean. We may remove comments that cross the line.
TomTomPainting - 2 years ago
HE NOW: WORKS FOR THE GOVERMENT TESTING HYBRIND HUMMERS... tELL THE GOVERMENT IS NOT IN ON BIG OIL AND RECORD PROFITS??? WE ARE ALL JUST THE CASH CATTLE OF THE GOVERMENT KEEPING THE POOR PAID FOR AND THE RICH WEALTHY
briank0590 - 2 years ago
that: is crazy
hahaufall - 2 years ago
NEAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: thats like my dream just fill up my car with the garden hose lol
Mathyboo - 2 years ago
The Angle of the Dangle.....: Is Proportionally Adversible to the Heat of the Meat...Obviously OIL TYCOONS
scipio_dk - 2 years ago
Laws of Physics and Chemistry: People who believe this most have falied chemistry or/and physics in highschool. You cannot transform(get) energy from a mass of a compound, and then still have the same amount of mass of the compound(in this case water) left after you "burnt" the compound. That would violate the First Law of Thermodynamics. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T
Abunai - 2 years ago
@scipio_dk well,.. Looks like you cant always depend on science then,: because this is real.
lilkobes08 - 3 years ago
@scipio_dk This video does not say anywhere that there is the same mass before and after...
ricardos - 2 years ago
Aiit...bein at uni is fun got to play with this y-day. heres a paper abstract innit: It is indicated that the creation of the gaseous and combustible HHO from distilled water at atmospheric temperature and pressure occurs via a process structurally different than evaporation or separation. thus suggesting the existence of a new form of water, apparently introduced in this paper for the first time. with the structure (H x H)-O where "x" represents the new magnecular bond and "-" the conventional molecular b
thrasher28 - 2 years ago
@ricardos Hydrogen: They have proven that the hydrogen would not burst into flames in a crash.
Hippietoaster - 2 years ago
Hydrogen is explosive: No one will massproduce this technology because its hydrogen, one fender bender and you go up like the hindenburg
PsychoNumber1 - 2 years ago
@Hippietoaster ha: what an ignorant thing to say... gasoline is far more dangerous than hydrogen. and the hindenberg burned because of it's rocket fuel for skin.
@Hippietoaster really?: genious.
The_Lord_Spawn - 2 years ago
hope this doent happpen: if water becomes used for fuel say goodbye to the human race. the eaarths water will deplete so fast it isnt even funny (though it being fast is still tehincally slow)
JynxedKid - 2 years ago
@The_Lord_Spawn ur wrong: when the HHO is burned, the byproduct is water which will go throught the water cycle all over again
Hazzer - 2 years ago
@The_Lord_Spawn Then: say hello to constent rain JynxedKid
Sparticus56 - 2 years ago
@The_Lord_Spawn Jag: It turns back to water after.
breakrulez - 2 years ago
Don't you see?: "take water and electricity". But for producing the energy needed to split water into H and O gases you need coal or whatever stuff.. So whats so clean about it?
lumpypillow - 2 years ago
@breakrulez you save the gas: just use water
GrevRev - 2 years ago
@breakrulez breakrulez: has a point. You need energy to catalyze the reaction to make HHO. Can't say I know how much energy this takes, but normal chemistry should predict a general loss of energy. Good thing I live in Norway where we get our energy clean (waterfalls) :D
MCBSOAD - 2 years ago
@breakrulez Yes but on the other hand: Carbon emissions from cars and other veicals will be cut .
necropolis - 2 years ago
wow: this dude is going to be knocked off by the government real quick
hustler815 - 2 years ago
This guy is going to be: filthy rich
OGrobC - 2 years ago
If this would make the market: Basically all world politics become senseless, so corporations and the government will probably never get him a big contract.
abaddonsbbq - 2 years ago
youd: think washington would be all over this - this would totally devalue the middle east oil market - deflating any wannbe Iranian pant load
priv - 2 years ago
It will never make it to us: Because the government cant tax it!
LU1G1 - 2 years ago
thats totally radical: thats it ill start a water company for cars only!
muralisubu - 2 years ago
wow: will it ever make it to the market
wiccawill420 - 2 years ago
True: I have my truck running on Gas and Water. I am working on getting rid of the Gas part, but I don't have enough power just yet. But it works. With the hybrid, I get about 150 miles/ Gallon of gas.
jamesbrooklyn - 2 years ago
"SHOULD save earth": but won't even make a drop in the bucket due to market forces. too many big co.'s make $ off other types of energy and will keep this item down.
winfield252001 - 2 years ago
PLEASE !!!!: DONT SELL THE THE IDEA OFF, TO THE BIG RICH AND GOVERNMENT RUNNING MOTHER FUCKING GAS COMPANYS
Nate69 - 2 years ago
Ok if this was really: a "Break through" then everybody would be talking about it and it would be on the news everywhere, clearly their is something wrong with this.
JesTerI3 - 2 years ago
@Nate69 ok: probably too expensive for the cheap ass government to allow
matt2511 - 2 years ago
@Nate69 yea: something is wrong here. but then again with how powerful the gas corporations are....I smell a conspiracy.
Hitman0420 - 2 years ago
@Nate69 It actually does work: This is different from normal electrolisis because in normal you put low DC voltage and high current to seperate the water the trick is using high voltage and isntead of Direct Current it is pulsed around 20,000 times a second which splits the water with very little current used aka takes much less energy but still produces a lot of gas
steve23guy - 2 years ago
@Nate69 what it is is..: There is no money in water... its everywhere.. i can get it during a bad t-storm.. 4 oz of water.. 100 miles.. fuck yeah thats a week of going to work for me.... but again, no one would make money off this.. so they wont do it..
veeenus - 2 years ago
You are all blind. You believe in god and your government.: And you deserve what happens to you.
kyle_1865 - 2 years ago
@veeenus what the hell does that mean?: honestly, what are you saying?
Olafing - 2 years ago
Hoax: water cant be electrolised because it has covalent bonding. and this wouldnt be on fox 26 news if it was
Olafing - 2 years ago
@Olafing and: if possible the energy put into it to change the molecule would be the same amount of energy that it would release in burning
Camdizzle - 2 years ago
I looked this up and: You actually lose energy by making this. The ratio of energy t make this stuff to the energy produced is like 6:1, s it's not really worth it now is it.
6man - 2 years ago
@Camdizzle exactly: where would you get the electricity to produce the HHO fuel? Burn coal? What good is that???
enterpray - 2 years ago
@Camdizzle Well: You could use nuclear energy to drive the production of whatever this is.
headbanger51 - 2 years ago
thank goodness: for global warming, now with the ice melting we'll have more water to drive my SUV
Earn cash by uploading your videos
Check the widget spec for intended functionality. However, no support is intended for upload direct in the page at this time.