Post your comment

• 
• Write your comment...
• Post Your Comment

Showing 1 - 14 of 19 comments

• 

  x0sophia0x - 3 years ago

  TAKE CARE BOYS!: dun make urself too tired.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  Azool - 3 years ago

  Best: gallery in a long time

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  lil_o1 - 4 years ago

  ok, heres the math i think?!: they were $3 each before, so u got 4 for $12. But now u get all 4 for $12 bucks which is the SAME DAM THING!!!!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  AMURICA - 4 years ago

  one: to many "motivational poster" pics. maybe even 2 or 3

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  gubaa - 4 years ago

  wow: that was a good gallery

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  vitorque's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  vitorque - 4 years ago

  bad, good, excellent should have been: good, better, best

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    remoteman1212 - 4 years ago

    @vitorquewow zig: tellin him to get a life, while you spend 6 minuets posting comments on a break gallery that almost blows more than you do

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    leesh91 - 4 years ago

    @vitorquetotally right remote: he needs a life for posting a few comments...nevermind the guy that is tracing other users,watching what they say and watching how often they comment

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  vamos - 4 years ago

  shortest gallery: ever?

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  Zelph - 4 years ago

  ew.aspx?ContentID=480246 please: :)

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  Zelph - 4 years ago

  Please vote for this pic... help me :): http://my.break.com/content/vi

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  savagemilkwavy - 4 years ago

  is it: just me or are these picture galleries getting smaller and smaller

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  DesertTuners - 4 years ago

  15 pictures?: 15 pictures... and you call that a gallery?

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  lrb081 - 4 years ago

  Is this even: close to being considered a gallery? Bleh.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  HeadHunta's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  HeadHunta - 4 years ago

  okay?: if it was 3 for 12 dollars, that means the packs were $4 a piece. Now its 4 for $12.. that means the packs are only $3 a piece. Soooo, they really are saving money. Right?

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    lrb081 - 4 years ago

    @HeadHuntauh no?: They "were" $3 a piece... to get 4 packs at $3 each is going to cost you $12. The "sale" states 4 for $12. It's the same.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    Dark_____Sky - 4 years ago

    @HeadHuntaidiot: ur retarded

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  ohnoesmofos's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  ohnoesmofos - 4 years ago

  sadly: lots of people would buy it thinking they are getting a deal, but don't realize they are paying the same price as before, lol

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    pupnasty - 4 years ago

    @ohnoesmofosto be honost...: the sign may say "Was $3...but maybe it was 3.50? i unno, its stupid though

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00