Post your comment

• 
• Write your comment...
• Post Your Comment

Showing 1 - 4 of 6 comments

• 

  RonMan53 - 10 months ago

  Without limits on X and Y, you get more solutions than this plot shows. He hand picked the solutions to get it. And no, a piece-wise function is not necessary if you bound X and Y, to to picket the boundary function so that you only got this solution would be a piece of work. It would be a separate set of equations altogether.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  11
• 

  HatazGottaHate - 10 months ago

  BS, you have to use a piece-wise function to do this...

  ReplyFlag as spam

  13
• 

  Genius_BMI_160 - 10 months ago

   Dang, that would take forever to enter into a graphing calculator but I kinda want to.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  PhysicsMathMan's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  PhysicsMathMan - 10 months ago

   tried it. cant get it to work

  ReplyFlag as spam

  41
  • 

    imbmizzle - 10 months ago

    @PhysicsMathManwhere did you try this? i ask as it is set to zero and most graphing is done in relation to explicit form, y=

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    bobafetts3 - 10 months ago

    @PhysicsMathManTried as well.. You can somewhat see it. There are some more answers for x and y that he must not have plotted.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00