STILL STANDING

Post your comment

• 
• Write your comment...
• Post Your Comment

Showing 1 - 4 of 8 comments

• 

  DannyIscute - a year ago

  they should have hired the guys that did 9/11

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  Kharos - 2 years ago

   Wow I got something new from each angle....o wait. my bad. nothing new

  ReplyFlag as spam

  01
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 4 replies  
  

  nick91's comment and (4) replies are hidden

  

  nick91 - 2 years ago

  OH how i wish the twin tower of NYC is as strong as this building!: 10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1! BOOM!!!!HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    FeuerFrei1205 - 2 years ago

    @nick91Too bad: That wasn't an implosion on the WTCs, it was 2 MOTHER FUCKING PLANES

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    Pyris - 2 years ago

    @nick91NO: It wasnt by the planes it was ment to get hit by planes and still stand it was impossible for them to fall because of an hour of smoke U HEAR THAT PEOPLE AN HOUR OF SMOKE AND ISOLATED FIRES NO FUCKIN WAY!!!

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    hughesSMFD - 3 years ago

    @nick91Pyris doesn't deserve: to live. You are one of the dumbest people on the planet. Just like the rest of those idiotic 9/11 conspiricy theorists. Get a clue and get a life.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    InChristAlone - 3 years ago

    @nick91Feuer, you honestly think that planes can make STEEL Buildings implode? Jet Fuel doesn't even burn hot enough or long enough to weeken the steel frame. This aside how do you account for WTC 7 IMPLODING. 7 wasn't even hit by a plane. And never in history has a Steel Building EVER imploded until 9/11. what about NORAD? What about the Put options on American Airlines? and the war we found ourselves in afterward? c'mon bro.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  Gord - 2 years ago

  Darn. That is one stable building: well, this proves that detinators are NOT the solution to this building. It stayed up. Whoever detinated it, try a series of BANGS, not one on the bottom.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00