Resolution:Standard | High | Highest
Soldiers Blow Up 400k Robot
 
 
 
 
 
 

Soldiers Blow Up 400k Robot

 
 
 

Video Details

Uploaded Sep. 15, 2007 by
abouttotiltabouttotilt

A group of soldiers find a location they suspect has an IED. They use a bomb defusing robot to neutrailize it but end up setting off the IED completely destroying the robot. Glad everyone was ok, however, sucks that they probably could of accomplished the same task with some well tossed rocks.

Post your comment

  • user avatar

Top Comment

  • LobsterMobster
    Top Comment

    LobsterMobster - 2 years ago

    Chances are...: the robot didn't set it off, the insurgent who was watching over the site did remotely. Anyway, this is one of the best uses of military funding there is. That robot's destruction either saved the life of one soldier who would've defused the bomb manually, or an entire HMMWV full of soldiers who would've been hit by it.

Showing 1 - 23 of 586 comments

Show hidden comments
  • BuilderDX

    BuilderDX - a year ago

     haha 400k keep laughing as hole its just my tax dollars at work glad it was worth a laugh

  • Pyro61

    Pyro61 - 2 years ago

     Tossing rocks wouldn't help. There was likely an enemy observer in the distance with the detonator switch, hoping to push it when our boys were within it's lethal circle. When he saw the robot, he figured there would be less evidence if the button were hit. KaBOOM! We won that battle!

  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
    Throttle13

    Throttle13's comment and (1) replies are hidden

    Throttle13

    Throttle13 - 4 years ago

    no, dumbasses: They do not cost $400k. Early prototypes of this packbot were over $150k. Now that they mass-produce them, these articulated ones are about $100k (and not intended to get blown up, they are meant for observation). The little wheeled BomBots with infrared cameras, night vision and sensors that ARE meant to go boom are less than $5k. No matter the cost, better bots than boys, anyday.

    • paskari

      paskari - 2 years ago

      @Throttle13I disagree, boys display better rag-doll-physics than bots do.

  • Burnsie

    Burnsie - 4 years ago

    Not $400,000: nope

  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
    rustyman1982

    rustyman1982's comment and (1) replies are hidden

    rustyman1982

    rustyman1982 - 2 years ago

    i think using: POWs would be better. they would blow themselves up anyway

  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
    s0dap0p

    s0dap0p's comment and (2) replies are hidden

    s0dap0p

    s0dap0p - 2 years ago

    I think that: An RC car woulda been better .

    • RichardHell

      RichardHell - 3 years ago

      @s0dap0pWhat RC? you mean like Coogan Bluff?

    • madforce

      madforce - 2 years ago

      @s0dap0pI was going to post the same thing! Get a $300 T-Maxx and run it over...a lot cheaper.

  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
    LobsterMobster

    LobsterMobster's comment and (1) replies are hidden

    LobsterMobster

    LobsterMobster - 2 years ago

    Chances are...: the robot didn't set it off, the insurgent who was watching over the site did remotely. Anyway, this is one of the best uses of military funding there is. That robot's destruction either saved the life of one soldier who would've defused the bomb manually, or an entire HMMWV full of soldiers who would've been hit by it.

    • Jacksmilinrevenge

      Jacksmilinrevenge - 2 years ago

      @LobsterMobsterI'd use: a HE grenade...those are much cheaper than robots.

  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 6 replies  
    BushDeathGood

    BushDeathGood's comment and (6) replies are hidden

    BushDeathGood

    BushDeathGood - 2 years ago

    They should send in: troops who support Bush to defuse that bomb. Much cheaper.

    • VividSnovv

      VividSnovv - 2 years ago

      @BushDeathGoodDisgust: The fact that you are against Bush is understandable, his intentions have veered far from the task of responding to 9/11 and moved onto something else..probably for oil i won't lie...but the fact that you can be such an arrogant person and support the death of our troops just because some of them may support Bush. If your avatar really meant something to you than you should be making comments such as lets bring our boys home and show them that this is not what needs to be done,show them how peace

    • xdavidj

      xdavidj - 2 years ago

      @BushDeathGoodAmen: <---

    • breaker_one_nine

      breaker_one_nine - 2 years ago

      @BushDeathGoodWhy don't they: just send you in there? Oh, that's right, because you don't have the balls to fight anyone...

    • bigboybowtieman

      bigboybowtieman - 2 years ago

      @BushDeathGoodHaha: VividSnovv got cut off, how embarrassing you fail at the internet.

    • Eodizzle

      Eodizzle - 2 years ago

      @BushDeathGoodbush death good: you like it up the butt dont you

    • chaosd

      chaosd - 4 years ago

      @BushDeathGoodwhy exactly: do you hate Bush and the war again? It sounds like you advocate killing and death anyway, so a little war shouldn't be an issue for you.

  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 5 replies  
    R0n_Mexico

    R0n_Mexico's comment and (5) replies are hidden

    R0n_Mexico

    R0n_Mexico - 2 years ago

    Why dont: we just use death row inmates?

    • ToddMoyerisgay

      ToddMoyerisgay - 2 years ago

      @R0n_MexicoHA: lol

    • V_God_V

      V_God_V - 2 years ago

      @R0n_Mexicoheres another question: why dont emos join the army?

    • BushDeathGood

      BushDeathGood - 2 years ago

      @R0n_MexicoV god: why don't you? Oh they don't take fags, that's why

    • bigboybowtieman

      bigboybowtieman - 2 years ago

      @R0n_MexicoYou talk: alot of shit on the internet. Probably a 500 pound virgin no doubt...

    • Eodizzle

      Eodizzle - 2 years ago

      @R0n_Mexicoshh.: shh

  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
    whitedevil2

    whitedevil2's comment and (2) replies are hidden

    whitedevil2

    whitedevil2 - 2 years ago

    NOOOOO!!!!!!: JOHNNY 5 ALIVE!!!

  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
    VincentNguyen

    VincentNguyen's comment and (2) replies are hidden

    VincentNguyen

    VincentNguyen - 2 years ago

    WTF?: 400k for that thing? Shit I coulda built like 400 of them for that price.

    • Toreyjw1

      Toreyjw1 - 2 years ago

      @VincentNguyenthats what the manufacturer charges...: the military dosent give a shit... its like the hospital charging me 275 dollars for ONE tylenol... insurance payed for it tho... i could build the same damn thing for 15 hundred...

    • Jacksmilinrevenge

      Jacksmilinrevenge - 2 years ago

      @VincentNguyenFool: You know nothing about government spending...

  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
    Sambo1022

    Sambo1022's comment and (2) replies are hidden

    Sambo1022

    Sambo1022 - 2 years ago

    Waste of money: Imho.I think we should let 5th graders make class projects. Robots that detonate bombs. We should film all of them and let each and every child know that he or she has helped in the war against terrorism. Also, not a good idea to be so close, and to hell with throwing rocks. Ever hear of a daisy-chain? There could have been a whole sting of them on the roadway, blowing everything to SMITHERINZES!

    • enbee

      enbee - 2 years ago

      @Sambo1022Clearly: Saving lives by using robots for tasks like that is a waste of money

    • BushDeathGood

      BushDeathGood - 2 years ago

      @Sambo1022Yes it is a waste: use republicans for those jobs.

  • lynnlynn838

    lynnlynn838 - 2 years ago

    bloader1: Wanna see full movies and tv shows? check out my profile website

  • hafmoa

    hafmoa - 2 years ago

    These machines stand up to the explosion better than you would think.: Most of the expensive stuff is in the base. It surrounded by solid steel and very low.They can be repaired and back in action relatively quick.

  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
    Macgyver56

    Macgyver56's comment and (1) replies are hidden

    Macgyver56

    Macgyver56 - 2 years ago

    400k?: i could make one of those at radio shack for like 10 bucks.. solar powered too.

  • Fox_Valley_Pilot

    Fox_Valley_Pilot - 2 years ago

    hmm..why dont they just throw food in that direction.: and the insurgents will come'a runnin!!! :)

  • Revoluti0n

    Revoluti0n - 2 years ago

    hmm: snipe down that IED :P ~revolucion

  • jtothed

    jtothed - 2 years ago

    lol: i called it!i called it!

  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 4 replies  
    gyhkhjklhnjklhjgkhgkhgkjhgkjhjkg

    gyhkhjklhnjklhjgkhgkhgkjhgkjhjkg's comment and (4) replies are hidden

    gyhkhjklhnjklhjgkhgkhgkjhgkjhjkg

    gyhkhjklhnjklhjgkhgkhgkjhgkjhjkg - 2 years ago

    YO: Was that a bet? Those mother fvckers better not be making bets with my tax money......

    • Clervis

      Clervis - 2 years ago

      @gyhkhjklhnjklhjgkhgkhgkjhgkjhjkgHmm: And you're concerned about your "tax money"? Next time lets just let a soldier walk out and defuse it himself to save you a little tax money.

    • sbrends47

      sbrends47 - 2 years ago

      @gyhkhjklhnjklhjgkhgkhgkjhgkjhjkgyeh: you douche

    • Silverdumper

      Silverdumper - 2 years ago

      @gyhkhjklhnjklhjgkhgkhgkjhgkjhjkgLIIIIIIIIIIII: BBBBBEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRAAAAAA you idiots spend tax money for really useless shit, so stop complaining(ACLU)

    • breakyourface

      breakyourface - 2 years ago

      @gyhkhjklhnjklhjgkhgkhgkjhgkjhjkgYOUR tax money?: First you need to get off yer lazy ass and get a job in order to pay taxes... Second, you are a tard

  • CaptObvious

    CaptObvious - 2 years ago

    Ooopsss...: Is that coming out of their TDY pay?

  • Bochis

    Bochis - 2 years ago

    !!!???: If we are going to blow up 400K well.. I can come up with a $200 dollars for that matter I think is pretty stupid! on the other hand we need an army of these to go escorting our troops!

  • 2_Late_I_Won

    2_Late_I_Won - 2 years ago

    it did it's job: that's why there are robots. better the robot that we can put a price on rather than a human which has no price.

  • cameleon_paints

    cameleon_paints - 2 years ago

    ..: NO DISASSEMBLE JOHNNY 5!!!

Show more comments Back to top

VoteBar 1.1