Resolution:Standard | High | Highest
Sheriff Allows Illegal Trespass
 
 
 
 
 
 
Homepage > Categories > Pop Culture > TV

Sheriff Allows Illegal Trespass

 
 
 

Video Details

Uploaded May. 3, 2007 by
Chat_StewChat_Stew

Some dumb Indiana Sheriff sits back and does absolutely nothing while an even dumber health inspector trespasses on private property without a warrant. I hope both these people got fired because this guy couldnt be more correct about his constitutional rights to privacy. Smart of him to get it all on film.

Post your comment

  • user avatar

Top Comment

Showing 1 - 24 of 3710 comments

Show hidden comments
  • jlb49094

    jlb49094 - 8 days ago

    sorry peoples, did some research. this guy had his case dismissed. Indiana Code 16-20-1-23 allows a health inspector to enter a property if they believe there is a source or cause of disease. However they're supposed to have given prior notice that they'll be showing up, and seems to me it's a little conflicted with federal law? Either way, he got dismissed.

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • jlb49094

    jlb49094 - 8 days ago

    deputy? sheriff? good job break.

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • ayycarlos909

    ayycarlos909 - 13 days ago

    only if he had a better camera & would of recorded longer ahha

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • GunBoatTruckboatTruck

    GunBoatTruckboatTruck - 14 days ago

    shoot them both !

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Scarewolf

    Scarewolf - 17 days ago

    There's no such thing as an actual open-and-shut case, but this is close!

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • frydaddyjuggalo

    frydaddyjuggalo - 18 days ago

    I think it's funny when I read thru the comments and I see ppl who put their break name as someone who was in the video, when ur just some random ass person. forever alone.

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • tyte90

    tyte90 - a month ago

    fuck that lady and that lazy cop! thats bs!

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • tyte90

    tyte90 - a month ago

    fuck that lady and that lazy cop! thats bs!

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Bryan-Jones-319

    Bryan-Jones-319 - a month ago

    dont wait for the cop to do YOUR job remove her yourself

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Breakking74

    Breakking74 - 2 months ago

    stupid lady

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
    foxcreekmo

    foxcreekmo's comment and (1) replies are hidden

    foxcreekmo

    foxcreekmo - 2 months ago

    cutest kitten video ever!!

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
    verstehetmich

    verstehetmich's comment and (2) replies are hidden

    verstehetmich

    verstehetmich - 2 months ago

    He says at 1:15: "...I asked you yesterday to get off of this property...". "IC 16-20-1-23 Inspection of private property; property in which officer has interest Sec. 23. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), the local health officer or the officer's designee may enter upon and inspect private property, at proper times after due notice, in regard to the possible presence, source, and cause of disease. The local health officer or designee may order what is reasonable and necessary fo

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
    • jasonguyperson

      jasonguyperson - a month ago

      @verstehetmichFortunately, federal law supersedes state law. The Fourth Amendment is as follows: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, *supported by Oath or affirmation,* and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." In Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Ame

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • jlb49094

      jlb49094 - 8 days ago

      @jasonguypersonI like when you guys go on rants and run out of typing space but you take no notice to it.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
    watsHappenin

    watsHappenin's comment and (1) replies are hidden

    watsHappenin

    watsHappenin - 2 months ago

    Is uncomprehensible the same as Incomprehensible?? He knows the constitution but his grammar sucks balls!

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
    • GunBoatTruckboatTruck

      GunBoatTruckboatTruck - 14 days ago

      @watsHappeninso what . he's knows his rights .depending on the state ,i would have shot them both Texas for example ,i would have had 2 body to dispose of LEGALLY!

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
  • Fb247able

    Fb247able - 2 months ago

    good job for the camera guy, and I would sue for harassment and trespassing among other things

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • FlySoup

    FlySoup - 3 months ago

    camera man dont know sh eeee it

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • dbondoc

    dbondoc - 3 months ago

    he's going to be one rich man now

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
    Smokeydd

    Smokeydd's comment and (2) replies are hidden

    Smokeydd

    Smokeydd - 3 months ago

    you mad bro?

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
    Bigjon626

    Bigjon626's comment and (1) replies are hidden

    Bigjon626

    Bigjon626 - 5 months ago

    I'm pretty sure health inspectors don't need a warrant and ALL property is private in one way or another DUMBA*S

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
    • frydaddyjuggalo

      frydaddyjuggalo - 18 days ago

      @they DO need a warrant and ever heard of public property, like a park? your the dumbass. do your homework.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      10
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
    sLaPiT

    sLaPiT's comment and (1) replies are hidden

    sLaPiT

    sLaPiT - 6 months ago

    A: They have probable cause. "Moving Dirt" would be just that. If you start digging a giant hole, you are going to hit something. If you hit something bad, well thats a health violation.... B: If an officer asks you your name, you are required by law(in most states) to give them your name. Since he never gave up his identity, there was no way to verify he was the owner of the property denying them access.

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
    • aaraven

      aaraven - 5 months ago

      @sLaPiTA: Possibility of hitting any lines or anything is a Building inspector issue, not health. B: Yes you are required to reveal your identity to officers but the officer is also required to provide an explanation of why she is there, and why he is asking for identification.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
  • ColtonCortese

    ColtonCortese - 6 months ago

    it's ex 2416 now, every talk to her or leave her a message asking why she trespassed and al er what happened afterwords.

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • uniquer

    uniquer - 6 months ago

    julie wolfe. laporte county health department. 219-326-6808 ex 200

    ReplyFlag as spam
    10
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
    uniquer

    uniquer's comment and (1) replies are hidden

    uniquer

    uniquer - 6 months ago

    julie wolfe. laporte county health department. 219-326-6808 ex 200

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • skinny3720

    skinny3720 - 6 months ago

    I remember this dirty butt if he was normal the health department would not be there. and don't do dumb shit where u can be seen. Shit-ass

    ReplyFlag as spam
    01
  • NorskRaider

    NorskRaider - a year ago

    Uncomprehensible ..

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
Show more comments Back to top

VoteBar 1.1