Plane Overshoots Aircraft Carrier

Post your comment

• 
• Write your comment...
• Post Your Comment

Showing 1 - 25 of 520 comments

• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  whinnie_the_poopy_'s comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  whinnie_the_poopy_ - 8 months ago

  Good to know the army is handling our tax money with care -.-'

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    Cesar-Hernandez-934 - 7 months ago

    @whinnie_the_poopy_uhm we don't fund the Russian military... duh!

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  Shawn-Huguet-979 - 9 months ago

  thats russian and it looks like a failed catapult launch, aka a problem with the hydraulic launcher.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  10
• 

  jazzycat1 - 11 months ago

  That's OK it was only a Russian plane.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  10
• 

  BruceFelkins - a year ago

  Russian?

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  TEICHROEB - a year ago

  Ha ha that was funnies

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  coollou - a year ago

  wow... why did that Lear jet go overboard???

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  JensPatzelt - a year ago

  1.) russian fighter: Suchoi SU-33 "Flanker-D" 2.) russian aircraft carrier: Admiral Kuznetsov Class 3.) the plane is landing and catch one of the arrestor wires with his hook, but the arrestor gear is defective and could not brake the plane in the right way 4.) the second plane aborting the landing (the hook is down) and makes a "touch an go" 5.) sorry for my bad english :(

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  BadDad123 - a year ago

  Not U.S. We don't have ramped decks on our carriers.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  BadDad123 - a year ago

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  Mlbbaez - a year ago

  wow millions of dollars in taxes ruined...

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  Wraith255043's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  Wraith255043 - 2 years ago

   dont they power up right after landing just so they can take off if something goes wrong

  ReplyFlag as spam

  20
  • 

    TheLostOtter - a year ago

    @Wraith255043 not the russians

    ReplyFlag as spam

    10
• 

  mattsju - 2 years ago

  You can really see the force of an ejection system - how it actually pushes the plane down when engaged when it's not moving fast enough to create lift.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  jarath - 2 years ago

   The arresting cable broke. See the plane after have to do a go around because no arresting cable? It launched like it did due to slingshot and he jets were still going.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  IrishManNY - 2 years ago

   Let's settle the take off vs landing debate once and for all. first off this is a Russian Aircraft Carrier, if you notice to the right as the jet goes off the deck you can see the ski jump that they use for launching the jets. Since the jet did not go off the ski jump, I think this was part of a failed landing, either a missed landing or a botched touch and go practice.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  Denkai's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  Denkai - 2 years ago

   that's not an F14, wings to small, fixed, nose cone is white, intake is round and set back, where as f14's intakes are square, large and right next to the cockpit. that's not even american. I'd say a Su-33, but I don't know. american carriars use JBDs during take off, i can't tell if that ship has them or not, but it looked like he was arresting (landing) however, the arresting crew got the tention limits wrong and it kept going. It would also explain the loud ringing of a bell to warn of an emergency, and

  ReplyFlag as spam

  40
  • 

    Denkai - 2 years ago

    @Denkaiin fact I see the arresting cable, it was defintately landing.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    30
  • 

    leonardbh2 - a year ago

    @DenkaiIts definitely Russian, you can tell by the carrier that has the angled take off deck, yeah UK and France has these, but the Russian ones have the small take off area to the right which the UK and French ones don't.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    10
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  nickv999's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  nickv999 - 2 years ago

  he was on take off: but he changed his mind because he had to pee

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    PlasticPigeon - 2 years ago

    @nickv999lol

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  53moreHP's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  53moreHP - 3 years ago

   Mr. Putin had a little chat with that pilot. "We don't steal American design Tomcat for you to give it a drink."

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    montess85 - 2 years ago

    @53moreHPIts not a f-14 tomcat....Its not even an American plane....Its a Russian SU-33....The tomcat has variable geometry wings....This has fixed wings....

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    senna27 - 2 years ago

    @53moreHPI would re-read his post. He did not claim it to be an American jet.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  Miketer1234's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  Miketer1234 - 3 years ago

   How can a plane overshoot the runway when its taking off!!!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    johnymo24 - 3 years ago

    @Miketer1234im guessing he didnt turn the engines on

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    Timikitusakii - 2 years ago

    @Miketer1234hahaha . he was trying to land he mist the court a k a the break balt and the rest is history

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  DavetheTurd - 3 years ago

  And in the middle of his backflip: he caught a football!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 4 replies  
  

  HiskeyPipes's comment and (4) replies are hidden

  

  HiskeyPipes - 3 years ago

  Its Landing...: That is the Admiral Kuznetsov Russia's only carrier you can tell cuz it has a ski ramp runway for takeoff because it doesnt have catapults. The plane is a Su- 33

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    medic8541 - 2 years ago

    @HiskeyPipeshmmmm......looks a lot like an FA-18 Hornet, but I could be wrong. I only worked on them for 6 years in the Marine Corps

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    bonerdust - 2 years ago

    @HiskeyPipesit is a landing, he's right. they take off on the ramp. the reason it looked like a take off following the crash is because the wing man did a touch and go, being that you can't land with a broken cable. hence the plane before getting a little wet. it does look like an f-18, but if you worked on them for 6 years and still can't tell its not an f-18 then you are a retard. probably why you went into the marines in the first place.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    montess85 - 2 years ago

    @HiskeyPipesYour an idiot...It looks nothing like a f-18.....I am glad your no longer working are planes anymore.....

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    boybluess - 2 years ago

    @HiskeyPipesare you fuckin serious!!??? "i think its an f-18, i worked on them for 6 yrs" !!!???? i worked on f/a-18's for 6 years in the navy and that is nowhere near even looking like a hornet. no wonder you were in the marine corp and we always got the most fucked up jet from you guys. its not a myth.... you guys really are retarded.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  Langer666 - 3 years ago

  See entire video on YouTube: It is LANDING -- go to youtube and see entire video.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  PissBreak - 3 years ago

  Follow me Goose: You're writing checks your body cant cash!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 4 replies  
  

  pacificgraywolf's comment and (4) replies are hidden

  

  pacificgraywolf - 3 years ago

  Looks like: the guys down below did not build up enought steam for the weight of the plane taking off

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    luigio94 - 3 years ago

    @pacificgraywolf...: ...what???

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    Gorestain - 3 years ago

    @pacificgraywolfLuigio94: what he means is that the catapult wasn't calibrated for the weight of the plane, which doesn't look to be true. It looks like the pilot was fully throttled up for the take-off in order to build up sufficient air speed.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    ZEUZ - 3 years ago

    @pacificgraywolfWHEN: A PLAINE TAKES OFF THE CARRIER IT'S CATAPULTED OFF LIKE A SLING SHOT, THE JET OR PLAIN DOES NOT HAVE ENOUGH POWER TO DO IT, ITSELF, THE CARRIER DID NOT BUILD ENOUGH STEAM OR IF THEY USE HYDRALICS DID NOT WORK BUT IT WAS NOT ENOUGH SO THE JET PRETTY MUCH CRASHED.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    kikyoazz07 - 3 years ago

    @pacificgraywolfno: the plane was landing, thrust was in reverse. the brake cable gave out

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  HaloJumpmaster - 3 years ago

  It was on takeoff: It appears the catapult failed.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  nottellingxx's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  nottellingxx - 3 years ago

  He didn't overshoot: it was a takeoff that failed.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    slich - 3 years ago

    @nottellingxxyour dumb: how do you over shoot a takeoff when your landing? are u gonna b a congressman cause you have the brains for it

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00