F-117 Stealth Model Crashes

Post your comment

• 
• Write your comment...
• Post Your Comment

Showing 1 - 23 of 213 comments

• 

  danthesurfinman - 3 years ago

  haha: comin in hot !!!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  kcphotoman's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  kcphotoman - 3 years ago

  Eject Eject Eject: At least a real pilot would fly the damn thing into a remote area. This moron flies the 500 pound craft back at the observing crowd. The "pilot" is damn lucky he didn't kill some spectator.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    tenkazPin - 3 years ago

    @kcphotomanthats part one of two: next time the pilot kills the whole crowd, and posts in on break. That would make a decent video.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    ephidaboost - 3 years ago

    @kcphotomanhe might: have put the plane down on purpose to keep it out of the crowd.. you just dont really know.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  x23xmatt's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  x23xmatt - 2 years ago

  little 1/4 scale: arabs took it down

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    megaton103 - 2 years ago

    @x23xmattha ahahahahahhahahah: hahahahaha classic

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 6 replies  
  

  ramby's comment and (6) replies are hidden

  

  ramby - 2 years ago

  yeah: they are worth up to 30grand but the servos and turbine engine was not harmed i gurantee it, buy another $300-1500 body kit and get to building! unless you buy a ARF that is

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    skyhawk1755 - 2 years ago

    @rambyservos: He might have to regear them but every thing else would be ok.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    Dliteful - 2 years ago

    @rambyBull: the engine wasnt damaged. He landed in sand and unless he was full on deadstick with zero rpms those turbines were drawing in air which means sand. And hed be foolish to reuse flight critical servos if they are potentially damaged.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    birkmilum - 4 years ago

    @rambyshutup!!!: i have no idea what you are talking about!!!

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    ephidaboost - 3 years ago

    @rambyyea thats tru: it definately wasnt totalled.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    Fresnel149 - 3 years ago

    @rambyTurbines?: You can't build a jet engine that small. I'd be willing to bet that thing uses mini props.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    AtOneWithNothing - 3 years ago

    @rambyHAHAHAH! Fresnel149: You are very ignorant. It is definitly powered by a turbine jet engine, which would explain why it sounds like an actual jet plane. Anyone can buy a small turbine engine, look it up buddy.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  MelloTG - 2 years ago

  Hey,: Was the Pentagon notified?

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  HUNGRYHANK's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  HUNGRYHANK - 2 years ago

  if you spent: 30,000 on that ur gay, thats 30,000 cheesebeefs!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    MGolem1311 - 2 years ago

    @HUNGRYHANKand that makes you: really fat

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    SgtSARS - 4 years ago

    @HUNGRYHANK1 cheesebeef is gay: You are a cheesebeef

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  dvddecrypter - 2 years ago

  This crash: Needs more fire and black smoke to be closer to the real thing.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  noitall - 2 years ago

  F-117: I'm sure that since he won't send the molds back to the origianl owner he can make another.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  VirtRamp's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  VirtRamp - 2 years ago

  The f-117 has very bad aerodynamics and is realy hard to fly, making a model of it: and flying it manualy without any computer help is hard. Im basing this on absolutely nothing and is probably a bunch of crap, btw.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    MelloTG - 2 years ago

    @VirtRampIndeed: iSomething like that looks very unstable unless you have a lot of air surface. A toy version is not near as aerodynamic as a paper plane!

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    Dliteful - 2 years ago

    @VirtRampI like: your full of bullcrap analysis. You should work for the Pentagon!!

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  ACEHOLLIO - 2 years ago

  LAST!: for now-that was a cool model-shuda built a real one-check out my vid

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  metaled - 2 years ago

  I love: it!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  guyyoulovetohate - 2 years ago

  Yes i love it: when people put so much effort and it all comes crashing down.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  kinghigh - 2 years ago

  those old farts standing around: hahahaha!!!!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  17_man - 2 years ago

  50 old ppl all together: "aww..."

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 3 replies  
  

  Nephilym's comment and (3) replies are hidden

  

  Nephilym - 2 years ago

  Bad plane to use in the first place: The F-117 is not a very maneuverable plane to begin with so building a model that takes tight turns isn't a good idea from the start.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    Disophisis - 2 years ago

    @Nephilymgood: point. f22 for the win

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    Visse - 2 years ago

    @NephilymI: have funny feeling that that wasn't his first RC-plane.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    monstateabaggah - 2 years ago

    @Nephilymbad: the trench mirage owns all of this

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  roney_puffz - 2 years ago

  well: if somebody pays 30,000 for a model airplane then they probably have more than enough to replace it...

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  Squeal - 2 years ago

  Run for cover.........: Its Crypto from Destroy All Humans

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  Burnsie's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  Burnsie - 2 years ago

  I love watcking R/C geeks fail: ...

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    Disophisis - 2 years ago

    @Burnsieyou love: whacking off to geeks fail

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  wimwim - 2 years ago

  that sucks so bad: good landing though

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  huichocalifas's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  huichocalifas - 2 years ago

  NO CHOICE: As a radio control expert i would say that after having this problem with the aerodinamics it was the best he could do instead of crashing over the expectators.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    itzfuct - 2 years ago

    @huichocalifasthat's true.: he had to make a calculated decision with no good choices. He put his friends' needs over his plane and that's why he's a man.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    tejasdude - 2 years ago

    @huichocalifasAs an expert at spotting nerds: The plane should have ditched into the crowd.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  u4ick's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  u4ick - 2 years ago

  At $30k we should be using these: To go to war with.................just put some kid flying it thinking he's playing a video game........................WE WIN!!!!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    itzfuct - 2 years ago

    @u4icknotice the scale in the beginning..: it's a good point, but in the beginning when it takes off you can see that it's not very large. Shorter than a man by a large factor.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    puresj - 2 years ago

    @u4ickisnt the army tho: making autonomous airplanes that fly in squadrons and bomb targets? i think i saw that on futureweapons

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  MechanicalReam's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  MechanicalReam - 2 years ago

  WOW...: That was a horrible attempt at an emergency landing.....he shouldnt have shut off the engine and tried to bring it in on the runway...i guarentee i could've landed that with maybe just some broken retracts!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    itzfuct - 2 years ago

    @MechanicalReamtotally!: I think you could have too. Your comment suggests you have more experience than they do. MechanicalReam, can you tell me how you'd do it?

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    Phiber - 2 years ago

    @MechanicalReamRofl!: Rofl @ itzfuct

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  pyro7272 - 2 years ago

  yeah: 30k is possible but it didnt look that bad for a landing it can still be rebuild

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00