Posted by tybo1003 on Nov. 13, 2007
738,637 375 484 Next videos
Be funny. Don't be mean. We may remove comments that cross the line.
Hersheyman - 2 years ago
that: way cool. Hey guys check out my video I uploaded of me nutting it on the trampoline
Konspir8r - 2 years ago
@Hersheyman Did it: bounce?
asecretthreat - 2 years ago
i was waiting to see a hand or something: .
7G1XX3R - 2 years ago
the water bottle was the best: next they should use a guy thats in jail for kiling and murdering innocent people, and watch bullets go through his body...itll be the best
basicInstinct - 2 years ago
@7G1XX3R right!: except of the jail guy...
aspensound - 2 years ago
well thats just great: now im hungry for some watermelon
Stranger1818 - 2 years ago
just: beautiful
cjvs1604 - 2 years ago
my favourites: are when the liquids collapse on themselves
FallingUpstairs - 2 years ago
TOMATO: KETCHUP
RayRon - 2 years ago
thats not: 5000 fps...theres no such camera that can do that
RUsum1 - 2 years ago
@RayRon actually there are...: and even faster. on discovery channel they have a show called Time Warp where they have a digital 10,000 frame per second film random things to look at in slow motion like a boxer getting hit in the face and stuff. smoke some more weed maybe you'll get even smarter.
ericmalcolm - 2 years ago
i cant decide: witch was better. the apple or water bottle
lildude56 - 2 years ago
@ericmalcolm I'd: say the water bottle
Reaper_536 - 2 years ago
@ericmalcolm for: sure, the water bottle
@ericmalcolm the melon: wasn't bad either
hogberto - 2 years ago
you americans: like guns, don't you?
rrasher - 2 years ago
@hogberto and you: obviously must like penis, dont you
Viper23rd - 2 years ago
@hogberto Rofl: ;p
@hogberto although i don't like guns: i think this video is great
methudx - 2 years ago
next time: shoot through your face i wanna see that
CreepaTB - 2 years ago
That was: one of the cooler things I've seen during school lately.
zerxan - 2 years ago
@CreepaTB ooo: badass lookin at stuff in school.
LolBreak - 2 years ago
That reminds me of: the shit that has been constantly coming out of my nose for the past 2 weeks
stalker_man666 - 2 years ago
hmm: i've always found these hi FPS camera things to look pretty good
RockerX - 2 years ago
34 seconds: was my favorite part.
ShockerFest98 - 2 years ago
@RockerX yeah: for sure
zebikabiro - 2 years ago
milk: was the best one
TheNerve - 2 years ago
What: a waste of a good bullet!!!
whoswho - 2 years ago
fake: thats fucken stupid..how much time do you have on your hands that allows you to make a fucken gay ass fake video?
Viagra_Falls - 2 years ago
@whoswho ...: Looks pretty real to me.
BlackCat307 - 2 years ago
@whoswho However: It could also be said that YOU obviously have so much time on your hands that you are WATCHING it. Ass.
blairmcm - 2 years ago
@whoswho yeh: get a life man if u dnt enjoy it go sumwhere else
GearJammer9 - 2 years ago
The Pink Mist: at the end remind you of a certain historical event?
omgitsnotfake - 2 years ago
@GearJammer9 no: not at all
_The_Rikor_ - 2 years ago
@GearJammer9 -_-: Would've been nice if you told us.
kac - 2 years ago
@GearJammer9 I think I know what you are talking about,: but other than that, I know how I will slice my watermelon from now on.
Epic209 - 2 years ago
@GearJammer9 HMMM: JFK ring a bell?
17_man - 2 years ago
REEEEEPOOOST!!: OLD!
WayneThePain - 2 years ago
.: Fake
JHackerX - 2 years ago
Uhh: That would be a Low Speed camera. Think about it, your standard video is 30 FPS, in 30 FPS you wouldn't see a bullet flying. Now lets say it's 5000 FPS, you're definitely not going to see a bullet flying, that would be like fast-motion. This might be like 10 FPS, or less, which would lower the amount of frames captured thus allowing you to see the bullets. Simply put, you can't see a bullet flying through the air at 30 FPS, you sure in the hell aren't going to see it at 5000 FPS. DOH!
IceBergGrafix - 2 years ago
@JHackerX LOL, Silly: Filmed at 5000Frames per Second, and then Played back at 30FPS would slow down high speed action. Pity You aren't in film school, They wouldn't let you near a 24fps camera.
@JHackerX JHackerX: you are most definitely stupid.
theonlyrealoogaBooga - 2 years ago
@JHackerX JHackerX: JHackerX you are obviously stupid. Don't talk anymore please.
dialated8 - 2 years ago
@JHackerX Wow: I love it when stupid people try to act smart. Think in frames... lets say you use one frame per second, like a regular photo... are you going to see any of this? no... 2 frames per second, you will see the watermellon, then no watermellon... etc... 5000 frames per second... you'll see 5000 pictures, in one second... slow it down, and you'll have this video.
TickNhomas - 2 years ago
@JHackerX You sir, are an idiot.: A "low speed" camera, like you stated would show the film skipping if something as simple as a man walking was filmed. This is because the term "frames per second" refers to how many frames of footage the camera can actually take per second, therefore a 5000 FPS camera would take 5000 frames every second and a 30 FPS camera would only take 30 frames in that one second...now which camera is going to have more footage of the bullet tearing through it's target? Obviously the 5000 FPS
@JHackerX You sir, are a moron: A "low speed" camera, like you stated would show the film skipping if something as simple as a man walking was filmed. This is because the term "frames per second" refers to how many frames of footage the camera can actually take per second, therefore a 5000 FPS camera would take 5000 frames every second and a 30 FPS camera would only take 30 frames in that one second...now which camera is going to have more footage of the bullet tearing through it's target? Obviously the 5000 FPS c
deltaray1 - 2 years ago
@JHackerX Wow: I hope you're kidding because right now you sound dumb as hell. Look up high speed camera sometime.
spid3rkid - 2 years ago
@JHackerX No: The video is taken at 5000 frames per second. Think about it, in one second of time 5000 frames are recorded. Now make it so that we see those frames in very slow motion. We're damn sure gonna see that bullet.
camelflage - 2 years ago
@JHackerX you're dumb: 5000 frames per second so when they slow it down you can see. It is a high speed camera. if it was 10fps then it would be like a post-it animation that a 2nd grader makes.
Dontfeardeath - 2 years ago
@JHackerX More replies above: to rub it in more please. Thanks.
Psythik - 2 years ago
@JHackerX Umm actually...: If the camera was recording at 10 FPS, the video would be so choppy when you slowed it down that you would never see the bullet. Most video cameras record at 24 FPS, and even at that speed you'd never see the bullet, no matter how much you slowed down the footage. However, if you use a camera capable of recording at 5000 FPS, when you slow down the video from that camera to 30 FPS, you get the really smooth slow motion effect as shown in this video. Do your research before you make such
subban - 2 years ago
@JHackerX dumb as a brick.: 'Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt. -Abraham Lincoln (attributed):
ReinhardtBII - 2 years ago
@JHackerX Completely opposite.: 5000 Frames per second causes everything to appear to slow down. At 30FPS, there are 30 pictures taken in one second. 5000FPS, 5000 pictures. A bullet moves so quickly that it cannot be caught by those 30 pictures. The time interval isn't short enough.
jorard - 2 years ago
@JHackerX jesus you are smug dumbass: why would less frames per second allow you to see a bullet? The FPS does not determine the speed of the film, it simply means that more frames are being captured per second. Thing of it this way: Someone throws a ball across you field of vison. Lets say you blink every 2 seconds, so for every 2 seconds your eyes are open, they are closed for 1 second. If the ball takes 3 seconds to go across your field of vision then you will only see it for max. 2 second, providing you time you
Airem - 2 years ago
@JHackerX HOLY MOTHER OF GOD: Your are the biggest retard i have ever encountered, you have NO idea how cameras work do you. an object moves in a continuous motion whether the camera sees it or not 30 fps is the norm allowed for a seamless transition of frames thus allowing no skippage the less frames per second means the more your going to miss on movement (aka lag) the higher the FPS the more detail you will see, this is necesarry when trying to capture something as fast as a BULLET on camera. Now read up on this
edictzer0 - 2 years ago
if doing bad things to watermelons is bad: a lot of people are going to hell and gallager is satan
Earn cash by uploading your videos
Check the widget spec for intended functionality. However, no support is intended for upload direct in the page at this time.
![[When Off-Roading Goes Wrong] Video](http://s.brkmd.com/content/break/img/misc/placeholder_244x137.gif)
Be funny. Don't be mean. We may remove comments that cross the line.