Resolution:Standard | High | Highest
Bullet At 5000 Frames Per Second
 
 
 
 
 
 
Homepage > Categories > Pop Culture

Bullet At 5000 Frames Per Second

 
 
 

Video Details

Uploaded Nov. 13, 2007 by
tybo1003tybo1003

This is an ultra high speed camera that can film at an amazing 5000fps and films a bullet blowing up a bunch of different stuff.

More Related Content From Break Media:

7 Videos Of People Getting Slapped In Slow-Motion

An Awesome Montage Of Babies Laughing In Slow-Motion

Holy Taco’s Video of the Day – Chimp with a Machine Gun

Post your comment

  • user avatar

Showing 1 - 23 of 375 comments

Show hidden comments
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
    Hersheyman

    Hersheyman's comment and (1) replies are hidden

    Hersheyman

    Hersheyman - 3 years ago

    that: way cool. Hey guys check out my video I uploaded of me nutting it on the trampoline

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • asecretthreat

    asecretthreat - 3 years ago

    i was waiting to see a hand or something: .

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
    7G1XX3R

    7G1XX3R's comment and (1) replies are hidden

    7G1XX3R

    7G1XX3R - 3 years ago

    the water bottle was the best: next they should use a guy thats in jail for kiling and murdering innocent people, and watch bullets go through his body...itll be the best

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • aspensound

    aspensound - 3 years ago

    well thats just great: now im hungry for some watermelon

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Stranger1818

    Stranger1818 - 3 years ago

    just: beautiful

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • cjvs1604

    cjvs1604 - 3 years ago

    my favourites: are when the liquids collapse on themselves

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • FallingUpstairs

    FallingUpstairs - 3 years ago

    TOMATO: KETCHUP

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
    RayRon

    RayRon's comment and (1) replies are hidden

    RayRon

    RayRon - 3 years ago

    thats not: 5000 fps...theres no such camera that can do that

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
    • RUsum1

      RUsum1 - 3 years ago

      @RayRonactually there are...: and even faster. on discovery channel they have a show called Time Warp where they have a digital 10,000 frame per second film random things to look at in slow motion like a boxer getting hit in the face and stuff. smoke some more weed maybe you'll get even smarter.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 3 replies  
    ericmalcolm

    ericmalcolm's comment and (3) replies are hidden

    ericmalcolm

    ericmalcolm - 3 years ago

    i cant decide: witch was better. the apple or water bottle

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 3 replies  
    hogberto

    hogberto's comment and (3) replies are hidden

    hogberto

    hogberto - 3 years ago

    you americans: like guns, don't you?

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • methudx

    methudx - 3 years ago

    next time: shoot through your face i wanna see that

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
    CreepaTB

    CreepaTB's comment and (1) replies are hidden

    CreepaTB

    CreepaTB - 4 years ago

    That was: one of the cooler things I've seen during school lately.

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • LolBreak

    LolBreak - 2 years ago

    That reminds me of: the shit that has been constantly coming out of my nose for the past 2 weeks

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • stalker_man666

    stalker_man666 - 2 years ago

    hmm: i've always found these hi FPS camera things to look pretty good

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
    RockerX

    RockerX's comment and (1) replies are hidden

    RockerX

    RockerX - 2 years ago

    34 seconds: was my favorite part.

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • zebikabiro

    zebikabiro - 2 years ago

    milk: was the best one

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • TheNerve

    TheNerve - 2 years ago

    What: a waste of a good bullet!!!

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 3 replies  
    whoswho

    whoswho's comment and (3) replies are hidden

    whoswho

    whoswho - 2 years ago

    fake: thats fucken stupid..how much time do you have on your hands that allows you to make a fucken gay ass fake video?

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
    • Viagra_Falls

      Viagra_Falls - 2 years ago

      @whoswho...: Looks pretty real to me.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • BlackCat307

      BlackCat307 - 2 years ago

      @whoswhoHowever: It could also be said that YOU obviously have so much time on your hands that you are WATCHING it. Ass.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • blairmcm

      blairmcm - 2 years ago

      @whoswhoyeh: get a life man if u dnt enjoy it go sumwhere else

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 4 replies  
    GearJammer9

    GearJammer9's comment and (4) replies are hidden

    GearJammer9

    GearJammer9 - 2 years ago

    The Pink Mist: at the end remind you of a certain historical event?

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
    • omgitsnotfake

      omgitsnotfake - 2 years ago

      @GearJammer9no: not at all

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • _The_Rikor_

      _The_Rikor_ - 2 years ago

      @GearJammer9-_-: Would've been nice if you told us.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • kac

      kac - 2 years ago

      @GearJammer9I think I know what you are talking about,: but other than that, I know how I will slice my watermelon from now on.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • Epic209

      Epic209 - 2 years ago

      @GearJammer9HMMM: JFK ring a bell?

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
  • 17_man

    17_man - 2 years ago

    REEEEEPOOOST!!: OLD!

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • WayneThePain

    WayneThePain - 2 years ago

    .: Fake

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
  • Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 15 replies  
    JHackerX

    JHackerX's comment and (15) replies are hidden

    JHackerX

    JHackerX - 2 years ago

    Uhh: That would be a Low Speed camera. Think about it, your standard video is 30 FPS, in 30 FPS you wouldn't see a bullet flying. Now lets say it's 5000 FPS, you're definitely not going to see a bullet flying, that would be like fast-motion. This might be like 10 FPS, or less, which would lower the amount of frames captured thus allowing you to see the bullets. Simply put, you can't see a bullet flying through the air at 30 FPS, you sure in the hell aren't going to see it at 5000 FPS. DOH!

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
    • IceBergGrafix

      IceBergGrafix - 2 years ago

      @JHackerXLOL, Silly: Filmed at 5000Frames per Second, and then Played back at 30FPS would slow down high speed action. Pity You aren't in film school, They wouldn't let you near a 24fps camera.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • 17_man

      17_man - 2 years ago

      @JHackerXJHackerX: you are most definitely stupid.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • theonlyrealoogaBooga

      theonlyrealoogaBooga - 2 years ago

      @JHackerXJHackerX: JHackerX you are obviously stupid. Don't talk anymore please.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • dialated8

      dialated8 - 2 years ago

      @JHackerXWow: I love it when stupid people try to act smart. Think in frames... lets say you use one frame per second, like a regular photo... are you going to see any of this? no... 2 frames per second, you will see the watermellon, then no watermellon... etc... 5000 frames per second... you'll see 5000 pictures, in one second... slow it down, and you'll have this video.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • TickNhomas

      TickNhomas - 2 years ago

      @JHackerXYou sir, are an idiot.: A "low speed" camera, like you stated would show the film skipping if something as simple as a man walking was filmed. This is because the term "frames per second" refers to how many frames of footage the camera can actually take per second, therefore a 5000 FPS camera would take 5000 frames every second and a 30 FPS camera would only take 30 frames in that one second...now which camera is going to have more footage of the bullet tearing through it's target? Obviously the 5000 FPS

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • TickNhomas

      TickNhomas - 2 years ago

      @JHackerXYou sir, are a moron: A "low speed" camera, like you stated would show the film skipping if something as simple as a man walking was filmed. This is because the term "frames per second" refers to how many frames of footage the camera can actually take per second, therefore a 5000 FPS camera would take 5000 frames every second and a 30 FPS camera would only take 30 frames in that one second...now which camera is going to have more footage of the bullet tearing through it's target? Obviously the 5000 FPS c

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • deltaray1

      deltaray1 - 2 years ago

      @JHackerXWow: I hope you're kidding because right now you sound dumb as hell. Look up high speed camera sometime.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • spid3rkid

      spid3rkid - 2 years ago

      @JHackerXNo: The video is taken at 5000 frames per second. Think about it, in one second of time 5000 frames are recorded. Now make it so that we see those frames in very slow motion. We're damn sure gonna see that bullet.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • camelflage

      camelflage - 2 years ago

      @JHackerXyou're dumb: 5000 frames per second so when they slow it down you can see. It is a high speed camera. if it was 10fps then it would be like a post-it animation that a 2nd grader makes.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • Dontfeardeath

      Dontfeardeath - 2 years ago

      @JHackerXMore replies above: to rub it in more please. Thanks.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • Psythik

      Psythik - 2 years ago

      @JHackerXUmm actually...: If the camera was recording at 10 FPS, the video would be so choppy when you slowed it down that you would never see the bullet. Most video cameras record at 24 FPS, and even at that speed you'd never see the bullet, no matter how much you slowed down the footage. However, if you use a camera capable of recording at 5000 FPS, when you slow down the video from that camera to 30 FPS, you get the really smooth slow motion effect as shown in this video. Do your research before you make such

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • subban

      subban - 2 years ago

      @JHackerXdumb as a brick.: 'Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt. -Abraham Lincoln (attributed):

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • ReinhardtBII

      ReinhardtBII - 2 years ago

      @JHackerXCompletely opposite.: 5000 Frames per second causes everything to appear to slow down. At 30FPS, there are 30 pictures taken in one second. 5000FPS, 5000 pictures. A bullet moves so quickly that it cannot be caught by those 30 pictures. The time interval isn't short enough.

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • jorard

      jorard - 2 years ago

      @JHackerXjesus you are smug dumbass: why would less frames per second allow you to see a bullet? The FPS does not determine the speed of the film, it simply means that more frames are being captured per second. Thing of it this way: Someone throws a ball across you field of vison. Lets say you blink every 2 seconds, so for every 2 seconds your eyes are open, they are closed for 1 second. If the ball takes 3 seconds to go across your field of vision then you will only see it for max. 2 second, providing you time you

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
    • Airem

      Airem - 2 years ago

      @JHackerXHOLY MOTHER OF GOD: Your are the biggest retard i have ever encountered, you have NO idea how cameras work do you. an object moves in a continuous motion whether the camera sees it or not 30 fps is the norm allowed for a seamless transition of frames thus allowing no skippage the less frames per second means the more your going to miss on movement (aka lag) the higher the FPS the more detail you will see, this is necesarry when trying to capture something as fast as a BULLET on camera. Now read up on this

      ReplyFlag as spam
      00
  • edictzer0

    edictzer0 - 2 years ago

    if doing bad things to watermelons is bad: a lot of people are going to hell and gallager is satan

    ReplyFlag as spam
    00
Show more comments Back to top

VoteBar 1.1