Bridge Shakes During Earthquake

Post your comment

• 
• Write your comment...
• Post Your Comment

Showing 1 - 24 of 408 comments

• 

  BeckMax - a year ago

   This happened in Puerto Aysén in southern Chile on april 21st 2007, it was a 6,2 quake. Check Wikipedia for more details.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  10
• 

  xTheMarksmanx - 2 years ago

  sounds like spanish with an hondurian accent, somewhere in Central America

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  Mumra's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  Mumra - 3 years ago

  Anyone know...: ...what langauge they are speaking?

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    adoboandfrijoles - 3 years ago

    @Mumraspeaking: spanish

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  mistamuthafuka - 3 years ago

  Bend but don't break...: Just like the Lions defense doesn't do. FIRE MILLEN!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  Jcliffo2 - 3 years ago

  Fake: theres no such thing as earthquakes

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  poncherello's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  poncherello - 3 years ago

  good engineering my ass..: at 30 seconds you see a bolt or something fall in the water.. the next peruvian sheep hurder is gonna fall in..

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    manny2chavez - 2 years ago

    @poncherello27 seconds to be axact

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  badasschris - 3 years ago

  This is what happens: when two Fat people have sex on bridges

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  dumponyourface's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  dumponyourface - 3 years ago

  bridges: dont exist

  ReplyFlag as spam

  01
  • 

    BradleyKidd - a year ago

    @dumponyourfaceBridges Do Exsist....YOU DumbAss

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    xEqSx1234 - 3 days ago

    @he was kidding

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  Elepski - 2 years ago

  You see....: Thats what it's designed to do duing a earthquake

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  fuqr - 2 years ago

  good engineering: makes this possible

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  Zach2581 - 2 years ago

  Hi: +++--+ ¦+¦¦¦++ +-----+

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  tgeufckde's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  tgeufckde - 2 years ago

  sad: mexican bridges can flop around and do all sorts of crazy dancing moves and shit... the one we have here in the us they just fall down.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    mjj1 - 2 years ago

    @tgeufckdehaahha: i know they got a huge bridge and with no supporters in the middle and its bouncin like crazy and the US one just falls

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  jamex147's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  jamex147 - 2 years ago

  imagine: if you were in the middle of the bridge u could get some cerial air

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    platniumfairy - 2 years ago

    @jamex147OMG!!: OMG!! Are you cerial?!!! LOL!!

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    Cheese117 - 2 years ago

    @jamex147no way!: you couldnt get cerial air, only cereal air.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  Chilensis - 2 years ago

  We are used to this.: I'll tell you where is. This happened in the south part of Chile and the guy who is filming is telling "is shaking pretty bad and you can see an mudslide on the hill" i can recognize the enviroment and accent bcuz i am from there.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 3 replies  
  

  freerider77's comment and (3) replies are hidden

  

  freerider77 - 2 years ago

  sorry to say but: the world trade centers were designed to take a lot, including a plane, but the way the main supports were set up and the angle the planes hit, the supports were weakend, and the steel melting fire didnt help. the buildings did stand for about 10 mins, and even if they hadve stayed standing, they would have had to be taken down, with explosives so its kinda a good thing they fell, cuz it was a very clean fall. This bridge is doin its job perfectly, as u can see, its almost still at the

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    canadianbuzzon - 2 years ago

    @freerider77so why was the steel melting?: i heard some physics prof at harvard or sumin sayin that there was no way the fire could of got that hot with out the US government strategically placing some chemicals so they could eventually place the blame of terroists and go steal oil from iraq?

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    Brocolli - 2 years ago

    @freerider77US government strategically placing some chemicals?: You Sir, should be shot, so that decent society need not further suffer your inadequacies.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    crimsonbarron - 2 years ago

    @freerider77were u born this stupid: pr did u continuously loose brain cells since birth wth stells melting temp is like 900-1600 degrees jet fuel burns much hotter than 2000 degrees if a prof at harvard said that then hes obviously a left wing idiot no i dont prefer one party over the other but man ur beyond that

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  puresj - 2 years ago

  *then: my bad

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  puresj - 2 years ago

  I know what you mean about the toll break: drop your last quarter than you gotta get out...

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  felipefesek - 2 years ago

  Civil engineering...: is the shit.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  Currie65's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  Currie65 - 2 years ago

  Idiots: Bridges are designed to bend and warp, its common knowledge, if it were rigid the thing wouls snap like a twig under that kind of pressure. I bet that most of you think its weird or faulty engineering that skyscrapers also swat in heavy wind aqnd earthquakes

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    Fixer808 - 2 years ago

    @Currie65True, but at the same time: you don't want it to bend too much, as in the Tacoma Narrows bridge.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  rem0's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  rem0 - 2 years ago

  thank god: engineers design bridges and not architects!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    doodyapples - 2 years ago

    @rem0dude: what the hell is that supposed to mean? haha professor obvious strikes again!

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  arno_88 - 2 years ago

  .: holy shit!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  bjdorr - 2 years ago

  Not Tacoma Narrows, streetlamp did not make it: At least the bridge didn't collapse under 30 mile-per-hour winds like the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in Washington State. One streetlight was seen toppling over in the video.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 3 replies  
  

  darryll23's comment and (3) replies are hidden

  

  darryll23 - 2 years ago

  Oh Yeah..It is designed to withstand earthquake: Just like the World Trade Center twin tower is designed to withstand airplane collision.........No kidding guys.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    Chef_Boyardee - 2 years ago

    @darryll23The towers were brought down after the impacts.: No kidding guys.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    basicInstinct - 2 years ago

    @darryll23by what?: explosives! no kidding ladies and gentleman

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    Fallafal - 2 years ago

    @darryll23idiot: duh, its not like bridges are made for that purpose, but if it didn't wiggle, it would fall down right away. even skyscrapers wiggle constantly, even when they arent in earthquakes. on some sky scrapers, the top floor is constantly moving up to ten feet back and forth.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  Grambo6 - 2 years ago

  DUDE!: You think that is something, I was on the golden gate bridge during an earthquake. I almost pissed my pants. THAT IS A FLEXIBLE BRIDGE!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00