13.4 Gigapicel Camera

Post your comment

• 
• Write your comment...
• Post Your Comment

Showing 1 - 25 of 634 comments

• 

  YourLocalNoob - a month ago

  Too bad the video quality isn't as good.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  foxcreekmo - 2 months ago

  cutest kitten video ever!!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  Bossesboss's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  Bossesboss - 5 months ago

  wow how completely fake, anybody that knows basic photography knows this is impossible

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    Sirquacksalot - 4 months ago

    @Bossesbossif you are moron, lots of things are 'impossible' this is totally possible. Probably just multiple pictures and a badass program.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  McJustice - 6 months ago

  WHERE IS YOUR WALDO NOW?!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  BrainForDinner - 12 months ago

  That's some serious CIA stuff. Now they only need one picture for the nude beach.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  cjm2164 - a year ago

  harlem-13-gigapixels.com

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  cjm2164 - a year ago

  i have one

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  heath146 - a year ago

  Somewhere out there is a nerd with a raging hard on !

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  ifitaintpsychobillyitsucks1 - a year ago

  boring

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  ShannaraShannara - a year ago

  What is a "Gigapicel" ?

  ReplyFlag as spam

  10
• 

  Dean981 - a year ago

  Too bad about the video quality.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  30
• 

  SASChii - a year ago

  that was Harlem? I thought it was North Korea at first.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  abek3 - a year ago

  I'd like to see the day when google earth has picture quality that good.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  wango_z_tango - 3 years ago

  damn that cannot truly be harlem!! can't see any drug dealing, prostitutes, crack ho's, gunfire or any sh!t like that!!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  30
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 4 replies  
  

  MidgetDaab's comment and (4) replies are hidden

  

  MidgetDaab - 3 years ago

  13.4 gigapixel: my ass, the telescopes on sattelites only get like 360 megapixel...

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    Azlodan - a year ago

    @MidgetDaabThe pixel count is how many photons the camera can process not how far in it can zoom. The telescopes aren't amazing for their pixel count but rather for their ability to see far far distances.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    10
  • 

    cjm2164 - a year ago

    @MidgetDaabits not one pic. it is a lot of pics. adds up to 14 gp

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    Sirquacksalot - 4 months ago

    @MidgetDaabthank you cjm. finally someone that understands

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    Wonbat - 2 months ago

    @the pixel count is not the photons. a picture would look like $}{it with that many pixels because of the s/n ratio. too much static even with gain offset.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  saltnutz's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  saltnutz - 3 years ago

  Dang: I thought it was gonna show a close up of a naked chick or something what a waste of 2 minutes

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    Actingrude - 3 years ago

    @saltnutz...: I completely agree...

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  Throttle13's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  Throttle13 - 3 years ago

  Freaking morons: The camera is NOT this high a resolution. The IMAGE is. And you cannot "clearly depict a person's face 20 miles away". What bull.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    stoneyyay - 3 years ago

    @Throttle13FU@#ING IDIOT U ARE: how the hell do u thin u get a pic of this high a res moron and this technologies been out for years its a quick time photo

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    NichlasSamuelsen - a year ago

    @Throttle13By putting many pictures together? DURR, stoneyyay

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  phat_killer's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  phat_killer - 3 years ago

  pfff: my webcam can do it 2

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    hakojako - 3 years ago

    @phat_killerNOW THAT: will be a kick ass strip tease

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• 

  maunakea - 3 years ago

  From Wikipedia: Name of project/picture: Harlem 13 Gigapixels Claimed by: Gerard Maynard Photograph of: Harlem, New York Dimensions: 279,689px (W) ? 46,901px (H) Size: 48.8 GB Pixels: 13,117,693,789 Year: 2007 The 13 Gigapixel size was reached by Gerard Maynard. The 2045 images were taken with a Nikon D2X with 300mm lens mounted on a modified Peace River Studios PixOrb. The stitching and exporting was done automatically by Autopano Pro. Full size zoomable image

  ReplyFlag as spam

  10
• 

  Mikemorveus - 3 years ago

  wow: now that's a camera

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• 

  luZk - 4 years ago

  20 miles away no less..: perhaps if you where in space.. but not here on earth.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 3 replies  
  

  kalva's comment and (3) replies are hidden

  

  kalva - 2 years ago

  not impossible: its 2045 pictures taken with a 12 megapixel camera all stitched together with software and an equation is built in moving the camera down a certain number of degrees and over a certain number

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    SuckMyFist - 3 years ago

    @kalvaOmg -.-: its not a 12 MEGApixel camera, i have a 5 megapixel camera on my cellphone, this is GIGA pixel and its 13 thousand or 13 hundred megapixel...

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    BovinePimp - 3 years ago

    @kalvasuckmyfist: suck some balls. Read what he said, moron. Its an assload of 12 megapixel pictures glued together. you asshat.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    weezilla - 3 years ago

    @kalvaactually..: It is a 12 megapixel camera. The pictures are stitched and overlayed. Overlaying them allows interpolation of pixels and further accuracy of what the picture actually is. Now... time to download the 48.8gb panorama and use it as my ubuntu skyline.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 2 replies  
  

  KingKong13's comment and (2) replies are hidden

  

  KingKong13 - 2 years ago

  .: I love how instantly everyone is a photography expert all of a sudden! Ha ha you lot make me laugh. How the fuck do you know its impossible? Are you all scientists, experts or egg heads who invent these kinda things? Please, if someone is I'd love to hear from them! Physical impossibility... how the fuck do you know? God you people are morons!

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    oldensandwich - 2 years ago

    @KingKong13i agree: >

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
  • 

    spitf1re - 4 years ago

    @KingKong13hmm: yes...

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  graf85's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  graf85 - 2 years ago

  hmm: they won't goning to sell cameras with 13,4 MP it's physical impossible to take a picture in this resolution at once. In this case they have stitched the picture out of high resolution telepicture (long focallenght) and made a Wideangle shoot out of it.

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    iamtheraven - 2 years ago

    @graf85Image stitching: Yeah, and if you look closely at some parts, you can see where the image stitching didn't work quite right.

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00
• Hide comment and all replies Show comment and 1 replies  
  

  breakpwner's comment and (1) replies are hidden

  

  breakpwner - 2 years ago

  Harlem?: nigs gonna steal the dogs at 1:22

  ReplyFlag as spam

  00
  • 

    nughead - 3 years ago

    @breakpwnerlol: lolol

    ReplyFlag as spam

    00